In this blog post, we will be discussing the principal finding of the Kansas City Patrol Study. This study is important because it is one of the first to document the relationship between police patrol and crime.
Checkout this video:
The principal finding of the Kansas City Patrol Study was that officer assigned to traditional patrolling duties, such as responding to calls for service and proactively looking for crime, had no effect on crime rates.
The Kansas City Patrol Study
The Kansas City Patrol Study was a landmark study in police research that examined the effect of different patrol strategies on crime rates. The study found that increased police patrols did not have a significant impact on crime rates, but did find that certain types of patrol strategies were associated with lower crime rates.
The Principal Findings of the Kansas City Patrol Study
ThePrincipal Finding of the Kansas City Patrol Studywas that “the deployment of police officers has a significant impact on the crime rate.” In other words, increasing the number of police officers on patrol duty results in a decrease in crime.
The Impact of the Kansas City Patrol Study
The principal finding of the Kansas City Patrol Study was that increasing the number of police officers on the streets does not necessarily lead to a decrease in crime. The study, which was conducted from 1974 to 1979, compared two different policing strategies in Kansas City, Missouri. One group of officers was given more latitude in terms of how they patrolled the city, while the other group was given more specific instructions. The study found that, overall, there was no significant difference in the amount of crime in the two areas.
The principal finding of the Kansas City Patrol Study was that more policemen on the street did not reduce crime. The study looked at whether or not having more police officers on patrol would lead to a reduction in crime, but found that this was not the case.