The principal finding of the Kansas City Patrol Study was that police officers working on foot patrol were more likely to solve and prevent crime than those working in cars.
Checkout this video:
The principal finding of the Kansas City Patrol Study was that more aggressive policing strategies led to reductions in crime. The study compared two different approaches to policing in the city – one that was more focused on traditional law enforcement activities and one that was more focused on community-oriented policing. The study found that the community-oriented approach led to significant reductions in crime, including a reduction in the homicide rate.
The Kansas City Patrol Study
The Kansas City Patrol Study was a landmark study that tracked the effects of different patrol methods on crime rates in Kansas City, Missouri. The study found that increased police patrols did not have a significant effect on overall crime rates, but did result in a reduction in violent crime.
The Principal Findings
The key findings of the Kansas City Patrol Study were that:
– Patrol officers made a significant difference in crime rates, especially in areas of high crime.
– Hot spots policing (focusing on areas with high crime rates) was effective in reducing crime.
– Foot patrol was more effective than vehicle patrol in reducing crime.
The Patrol Study was a six-year prospective study of 1,000 young men in Kansas City, Missouri. The men were divided into two groups: a control group and an experimental group. The experimental group was given extensive job training and social support in an attempt to help them find and keep jobs. The control group was not given any special job training or support.
The patrol study found that the experimental group was more likely to find and keep jobs than the control group. However, the study also found that the experimental group was no more likely to engage in criminal activity than the control group. This finding led the researchers to conclude that the job training and support had no effect on crime rates.
The Relevance Today
The principal finding of the Kansas City Patrol Study was that the number of police officers on foot patrol had a significant impact on crime rates. The study found that when there were more officers on patrol, crime rates decreased. This finding is still relevant today, as it shows that foot patrols are an effective way to deter crime.
The Lessons Learned
The principal finding of the Kansas City Patrol Study was that there were significant differences in the amount of crime committed in areas where there was more or less police presence. The study found that more police meant less crime, and that the most effective way to reduce crime was to have a greater number of officers on patrol.
The study found that concentrated enforcement efforts in high-crime areas and hot spots can be an effective means of reducing crime. The study also found that officers who are proactive and engaged in community policing are more effective in reducing crime than those who are not.
The principal finding of the Kansas City Patrol Study was the impact that community policing had on crime rates. The study found that when police officers were more involved in the community, there was a significant decrease in crime rates. The study also found that community policing did not have a significant impact on traffic safety.
The most important finding of the Kansas City Patrol Study was that police officers have a significant impact on crime rates. In particular, the study found that when police officers increased their patrols in high-crime areas, crime rates fell sharply. This finding has had a lasting impact on policing strategy, and has led to the widespread adoption of “ Broken Windows ” policing.
The future of the Kansas City Patrol Study is still up in the air. The data collected from the study has been used by the Kansas City Police Department to help guide their strategies and tactics, but it is still not clear if the study will continue or if it will be expanded to include other cities.