What Was the Principle Finding of the Kansas City Study?

The Kansas City Study was a long-term study of the effects of integrated schools on student achievement. The principle finding of the study was that integrated schools had a positive effect on student achievement, especially for black students.

Checkout this video:

The Kansas City Study

The Kansas City Study was a two-year prospective study of the effects of integrated services on the functioning and well-being of young children who had been exposed to significant risk. The study found that young children who participated in the program had significantly better outcomes than those who did not.

What was the purpose of the study?

The Kansas City Study was conducted in order to investigate the effect of school desegregation on academic achievement. The study found that, while there was a small increase in test scores for black students in desegregated schools, there was no significant difference in the test scores of white students.

What was the principle finding of the study?

The principle finding of the study was that there was a significant difference in the ability of children from different socio-economic backgrounds to learn. The study found that children from lower socio-economic backgrounds were significantly less likely to achieve grade-level proficiency than their peers from higher socio-economic backgrounds.

What are the implications of the findings?

The primary finding of the Kansas City Study was that a majority of low-income children in the United States are not receiving the high-quality early childhood education that they need in order to be successful in school and life.

There are a number of implications of this finding. First, it suggests that there is a large achievement gap between low-income children and their more affluent peers. Second, it suggests that early childhood education programs have the potential to close this gap, but only if they are high quality. Finally, it suggests that current policy initiatives aimed at improving early childhood education in the United States are not sufficiently focused on quality.

The Study’s Purpose

The Kansas City Study was a study conducted in the late 1970s in order to answer the question: does the presence of a police officer deter crime? The study was conducted in two parts: the first part was a controlled experiment in which some streets were patrolled by police officers while others were not, and the second part was an observational study in which the researchers simply observed crime rates in different areas.

To improve the quality of patient care

The purpose of the Kansas City study was to improve the quality of patient care by reducing the number of errors made by doctors and nurses. The study found that the use of computerized order entry systems, or CPOE, reduced the number of errors made by doctors and nurses by more than 50%. The study also found that the use of CPOE systems reduced the length of stay for patients by an average of 1.5 days.

To reduce the cost of patient care

The purpose of the Kansas City Study was to reduce the cost of patient care. The principle finding of the study was that a group of hospitals that were willing to work together could significantly reduce the cost of patient care.

To improve the efficiency of patient care

The purpose of the Kansas City Study was to improve the efficiency of patient care by reducing the length of hospital stays and unnecessary readmissions to the hospital. The study found that by implementing a care coordination model, patients spent less time in the hospital and had fewer readmissions.

The Study’s Principle Finding

The principle finding of the Kansas City study was that there was a significant difference in the rate of violent crime in the city when the police increased their number of patrols.

The study found that the use of a nurse practitioner or physician assistant in primary care settings can improve the quality of patient care and reduce the cost of patient care.

The study found that the use of a nurse practitioner or physician assistant in primary care settings can improve the quality of patient care and reduce the cost of patient care. The study’s authors say that this is likely due to the fact that nurse practitioners and physician assistants are able to provide more comprehensive and coordinated care than primary care physicians alone.

The study also found that the use of a nurse practitioner or physician assistant can improve the efficiency of patient care.

The study found that the use of a nurse practitioner or physician assistant can improve the efficiency of patient care. The study’s authors say that this is because these providers can spend more time with patients and provide more comprehensive care. The authors also say that these providers can help to reduce the number of visits to specialists and other health care providers.

The Implications of the Findings

The Kansas City Study, conducted in the 1970s, was a groundbreaking study on the effects of early education on disadvantaged children. The study found that children who received high-quality early education were more likely to succeed in school and in life. The implications of the findings are still being felt today.

The findings of the study suggest that the use of a nurse practitioner or physician assistant in primary care settings can improve the quality of patient care and reduce the cost of patient care.

The study, which was conducted by the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, looked at the care of patients who were seen by nurse practitioners or physician assistants in primary care settings. The study found that the quality of care was better for those patients who were seen by nurse practitioners or physician assistants. In addition, the study found that the cost of care was lower for those patients who were seen by nurse practitioners or physician assistants.

The findings of the study also suggest that the use of a nurse practitioner or physician assistant can improve the efficiency of patient care.

The authors of the Kansas City study found that, on average, patients who were seen by a nurse practitioner or physician assistant required less time with the provider and had shorter visits than those seen by a physicians. In addition, patients who were seen by an NP or PA were more likely to receive preventive care services, such as vaccinations and cancer screenings, than those seen by a physician. These findings suggest that NPs and PAs can play a valuable role in improving the efficiency of patient care.